Barack Hussein Obama is clearly performing a politic of a) decreasing US power in the world and b) increasing US federal political control over US citizens. The first political option is intended to turn USA more likely to be attacked by US ’s enemies, and the second one is intended to cut out or diminish the chances of popular opposition to Obama’s rule.

Obama is showing a overwhelming sympathy towards aggressive Islamic regimes which are profoundly committed to any sort of anti-US political campaigns. Obama and his entourage are trying to persuade the American political elite that Iran should have access to nuclear weaponry. On the other hand, Obama intends to have a 8 billion USD cut on US defense budget at the same very moment China completes its program to produce a new ballistic missile capable of destroying US carriers by a single shot within a two thousand miles range.

The Obama’s policy towards Cuba is going to turn Fidel’s regime stronger than it was some months ago. Fresh money coming from USA tourists and American non-governmental organizations financed by the federal budget will serve to give the brothers Castro a new start and it is expected that Cuban spying agents ― the so called “community advisers” ― will soon be entering USA borders at ease with Obama’s consent.

Unable to openly apply his agenda of guns control as the American people would not accept it ― at least for a while ―, Obama is now trying to keep US private ammo stores’ stocks availability as low as possible by establishing new customs barrier to the importation of raw materials that are used in the US ammunition production. With this policy, Obama has achieved a reality where American citizens will continue to carry their guns with shorted ammo availability or even without bullets. Pretty clever, isn’t it?

Obama is using FDA to promoting the so called “Codex Alimentarius” which is a UN food program controlled by a bunch of worldwide corporations such as Al Gore’s Monsanto. For instance, “Codex Alimentarius” will prohibit the old typical American home vegetables production made in US citizens countryside backyards, as well as “natural food” production ― i.e., vegetables without fertilizers or antibiotics ― will be also prohibited by Obama’s ruling just to serve his liberal entrepreneurial friends. “Codex Alimentarius” demands that each chicken or whatever animal raised by a US citizen at his backyard for his own consumption must be registered and controlled by Obama’s government and according to federal legal requirements and specifications.

Bureaucracy will be soon enormously increasing in America and that will mean a social-fascist regime has arrived.

The liberal senator Jay Rockefeller recently presented a Bill to the House that will put the Internet entirely and directly under American presidency staff control. Equally, the electoral census is already coordinated and controlled by Obama’s staff. Never before, in the History of United States, a president has had such a concentrated power as Barack Obama.

Such a concentration of power shows itself the construction of a totalitarian regime, a sort of a “new fascism” that unites the economic and financial power of the Trilateral and Bilderberg mentors with the populism of a political puppet as Barack Obama. These are the people who are relentlessly working for the “up to down” fascist revolution as Mussolini did in Italy in the twenties of last century ― a sort of totalitarian revolution that is imposed by the plutocracy elites to the people who worships a clown who humbly serves the plutocrats.

As an outside observer, I think that Obama is preparing to systematically and relentlessly eliminating the American traditional political system which has been warranting economics freedom and political liberty since the Founding Fathers. Obama is betraying the founding American ideals; I have no doubt about it.

The hate crime bill that passed the U.S. House of Representatives April 29 is an attempt by democratic socialists and progressives to silence dissent against alternative lifestyles. Their incessant iconoclastic attacks on once established values and morality have nearly eroded this nation’s spiritual and cultural legacy. Instituting same-sex marriage and prosecuting hate speech will complete the process and shatter the remaining hopes for cultural regeneration and tear down the last vestiges of the country’s Judeo-Christian ethic.

In America’s brave new post-modern multiculture, homosexual and transgender people will become a federally-protected class under the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, HR-1913. Under this act, anyone who publicly opposes the practice of homosexuality or any of the 30 other sexual orientations as designated by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) could be charged with expressing “hateful words” and convicted of a “hate crime.”

Under the guise of tolerance, Canada and European countries have implemented hate crimes legislation to suppress expressions that conflict with public opinion or do not conform to politically-correct policies, i.e., the views of the state are the views of the people. Only designated groups and minorities belong to the protected classes. The majority of Canadians and Europeans are not free to express politically incorrect religious beliefs, moral convictions, and political ideas publicly for fear they may enrage members in the protected classes.

Full story

Global cooling has arrived. Global warming is dead.

There is now irrefutable scientific evidence that far from global warming the earth has now entered a period of global cooling which will last at least for the next two decades.

Evidence for this comes from the NASA Microwave Sounding Unit and the Hadley Climate Research Unit while evidence that CO2 levels are continuing to increase comes from the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii.

Full story

DETROIT, Mich. — A graduate counseling student at Eastern Michigan University, who was expelled from the program for not affirming homosexual behavior as acceptable, has filed a federal lawsuit.

Attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund Center for Academic Freedom said the school dismissed Julea Ward from the program because she would not agree prior to a counseling session to affirm a client’s homosexual behavior and would not retract her stance in subsequent disciplinary proceedings.

Full Story

Adolf Hitler was gay – or so says a sensational new biography on the Nazi dictator due to be published tomorrow.
Eyewitness accounts from Hitler’s former lovers, and historical documents that for the first time illuminate rumours that have circulated for over half a century, are disclosed in Hitler’s Secret: The Double Life of a Dictator .

The respected German historian Lothar Machtan even claims in his book that Hitler ordered the deaths of several high-ranking Nazis to prevent the secret of his homosexuality from surfacing.

Ernst Röhm, the leader of Hitler’s Sturm Abteilung or Storm Troopers, tried to blackmail Hitler by threatening to reveal his sexuality. Röhm, who was also gay, was murdered as a result, according to Machtan, a history teacher at Bremen University.

Full story

“Let us be clear about one thing: Republicans lost in 2008 and 2006 not because they ran on conservative ideas but because they ran away from conservative ideas.”

By Lee Edwards, Ph.D.
Heritage Foundation

“Ironically, the more Dawkins tries to advance the case for atheistic Darwinism the more he seems to end up dressing up his beliefs with all the trappings of a religion.”

Spotted here.

The Eric Voegelin’s Second Reality is a sort of a virtual life as we see it in the Second Life Internet game. The Second Reality consists itself in a new reality coercively constructed that undermines the true natural reality of a person (or a group of persons), making the natural objective reality void.

The Second Reality is a characteristic of any ideology and the process of dissociation from Nature and its objective reality is made by a self-inflicted violence ― a sort of a masochist process ― in which the individuals are persuaded to increasingly hate and deny the true reality as it comes from natural phenomena.

The ideological “second reality” is, therefore, a pathology ― it is really a mental disease ―, because ― as Voegelin put it ― it destroys the human language due to fact that as the ideological second reality looses contact with reality, the ideological thinker uses the language not to express the natural reality itself, but to express his/her alienation in relation to the true reality.

Just a comment to this post:

George Edward Moore’ s ethics is the poorest we can find in the history of ideas. Taking the example of Moore to argue against Harris is the same as watching two slim wrestlers running away from each other in the wrestling ring. Moore based its ethics on common sense, his ethics is static, conformist and did not offer any help to solve the problems that moral life represents.

What Moore did was simply accepting all established rules, and the scientific basis for ethics that he tried to find out was reduced to a total abandonment of tradition.

Harris follows Aquinas’ theory of “natural good” inspite of giving to it a different sense.

Is Subjectivity part of moral and ethics? Yes, it is! But…

Phenomenology taught us about a recent concept: “Intersubjectivity”. It means that there is a “fabric” of relations prior and preliminary to the definition of “Subjects” who are united by those relations.

Furthermore, Einstein’s relativity defined the “subjectivity” of the observer (subject); however, there are some laws of Physics that regulate those subjectivities by creating a possibility of interchangeable and conversion of several subjective realities ― e.g., there is a physical superstructure that is defined by natural laws (physics) which connects the observers’ relativity (subjectivity).

Recently, the Iowa Supreme Court has ruled in favor of same-sex “marriage” basing its decision upon the argument that “the moral opposition to it is based on religion”. Bearing in mind that there are judges involved in that decision, the argument is ― at least ― funny.

Any concept of marriage is based upon a religion; what changes and differs from one case to another, is the type of religion in stake. When we look into human History, we see that not all religions produced a civilization, but we can see that any major civilization could not exist without a religion. I am talking about facts, here.

The religion that supports same-sex “marriage” ― the religion followed by the Iowa SC judges ― and rules it out without the people’s auscultation (referendum) is a religion that is guided by a metastatic faith: the belief that it is possible to change the fundamental nature of reality ― changing not only human nature, but the essence of Nature as a whole. This religion is a naturalistic monism that denies the validity of natural reality itself, inspite of allegedly basing its beliefs upon a naturalistic Weltanschauung . So, this religion contradicts itself: defining itself as a naturalistic monism, it does not accept the very reality of human nature. It is a irrational religion.

On the other hand, the religion that supports the concept of marriage between a man and a woman is a religion that takes into consideration the attuning of the human soul with the indivisible divine, and this kind of religion is the one that has supported all major civilizations throughout Human History. Only religions that have adopted the Metaxy ― the experience of the encounter of human consciousness with transcendent reality ― have produced great civilizations. So, this latter religion (Christian religion, in the American case) respects the trends and essence of Nature and validates the importance of Metaxy; it is a double rational religion.

What is in stake with the definition of marriage is either the rationality that defines a civilization or the absence of rationality that condemns it to decadence.

« Previous PageNext Page »